Saturday, March 16, 2013

Reaching Goals Through Action

When it is obvious that the goals cannot be reached, don't adjust the goals, adjust the action steps.

Confucius


  After hours of work, I have revised my action research plan, which is posted below. I would greatly appreciate any feedback and will return the favor. Thank you!


Corina Kelly’s Action Research Plan
Goal: Determine the impact of the SuccessMaker math intervention on third, fourth, and fifth grade special education students’ improvement in math performance.
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
1. Meet with some members of the leadership team and SuccessMaker representative to discuss the purpose of the SuccessMaker program. 
C. Kelly

Site supervisor

Campus Instructional Specialist

Campus Technologist

SuccessMaker representative
March 2013
SuccessMaker training materials
Meeting notes
2. Attend training led by SuccessMaker representative in order to learn about program’s rationale and how to effectively implement the program.
C. Kelly

SuccessMaker representative
March 2013
SuccessMaker training materials

Computer connected to the internet


Training notes
3. Meet with 1st-5th grade classroom teachers to discuss special education math concerns and the use of SuccessMaker math as an intervention.
C. Kelly

Site supervisor

Campus Technologist

1st-5th grade classroom teachers

SuccessMaker representative
March 2013
SuccessMaker PowerPoint

Computer and projector

Handouts for teachers
Meeting notes
4. Create a schedule to ensure all special education students have at least four 15-minute sessions of SuccessMaker math weekly that do not conflict with other interventions or requirements.
C. Kelly

Site supervisor

March 2013
Campus master schedule

Classroom teachers’ schedules

Speech and Dyslexia teachers’ schedules
Approval of completed schedule by site supervisor
5. Meet with Campus technologist to arrange for 10 laptop computers to be updated and set up with appropriate software for implementation of SuccessMaker.
C. Kelly

Campus Technologist
March 2013
10 Laptop computers

Requirements to run SuccessMaker program on computers

Link to SuccessMaker program
10 Laptop computers located in special education classroom run SuccessMaker.
6. Implement SuccessMaker math program based on approved schedule.
C. Kelly

Site supervisor
March 2013 – January 2014
10 Laptop computers

Approved schedule
SuccessMaker report showing students spending at least 45 minutes weekly on math program.
7. Meet with SuccessMaker representative to learn how to gather, interpret, and analyze program’s math data.
C. Kelly

SuccessMaker representative
March 2013
SuccessMaker training materials

Computer connected to the internet


Meeting notes
8. Read relevant literature to gather information about the success of SuccessMaker math or similar web-based math interventions.

C. Kelly
March 2013 – May 2013
SuccessMaker math literature
Reflection about literature that evaluates the success of SuccessMaker math or similar web-based math interventions.
9. Collect, interpret, and analyze control group assessment data from the Scholastic Math Inventory.
C. Kelly

Campus Instructional Specialist

Site supervisor
March 2013 – May 2013
Scholastic Math Inventory (SMI) scores for 3rd-5th grade special education students from the beginning of the year (BOY) and middle of the year (MOY) for the 2012-2013 school year
Evaluation of 3rd-5th grade special education students’ growth in math performance from the BOY to the MOY for the 2012-2013 school year based on SMI scores.
10. Collect, interpret, and analyze summative data from the Scholastic Math Inventory.
C. Kelly

Campus Instructional Specialist

Site supervisor
January 2014 – February 2014
Scholastic Math Inventory (SMI) scores for 3rd-5th grade special education students from the beginning of the year (BOY) and middle of the year (MOY) for the 2013-2014 school year
Evaluation of 3rd-5th grade special education students’ growth in math performance from the BOY to the MOY for the 2012-2013 school year based on SMI scores.
11. Compare data collected in steps 9 and 10 to determine the impact of SuccessMaker math on improvement in math performance.
C. Kelly

February 2014 – April 2014
Evaluations of data collected in step 9 (growth without intervention) and step 10 (growth with intervention).
Evaluation of data showing students’ growth in math performance without SuccessMaker intervention compared to growth with the intervention.
12. Evaluate the action plan by presenting results of action research to campus, site supervisor, and online colleagues.
C. Kelly
May 2014
Literature review

Data obtained in all previous steps
Action Research Report

Blog Postings

Oral presentation at faculty meeting

 
Format based on Tool 7.1 from Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools
(Harris, Edmonson, and Combs, 2010)

8 comments:

  1. Your plan looks well thought out and thorough. Your timeline looks good, and honestly, it helped me with mine. I look forward to hearing about your results and journey on here. I also am curious as to how much our plans will change as we begin our inquiries.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks! I'm glad I was able to help a little. I know I looked to others' plans for help when writing mine.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This plan looks great! Your plan really helped me in the structural development of my own plan. You're timeline is well thought-out and spaced out enough so you won't be bogged down with work. I am very interested in seeing the results of your plan regarding special education students. I think recording the progress and success of our special education students is often overlooked and this information is of vital importance to special education teachers and programs. Its great that you are zeroing in on one specific program and its success. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Steve! I hope my results will bring more attention to the needs of special education students. I tried to keep my project from getting too large by examining many different interventions. After reading the Harris et al. text, though, I realize that I need to add more sources of evidence for the growth in math performance.

      Delete
  4. Corina, this looks great!!! I love that you have so many steps for data collection and analysis. In situations like you are dealing with, it is incredibly important to generate as much valid information as possible. I know that when looking at student performance, many districts simply try the next big fad in education, but do not spend the time necessary to see if that program actually works for the students. I have never heard of SuccessMaker before, so I am looking forward to seeing the results of your study. I have many math teacher friends who are looking for ways to improve student performance in math, so I know this research will be very helpful to them!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am a substitute teacher in my district and most of the time they call me in Middle school and whether I liked it or not it turned out that I always teach Math inclusion or special education Math so your research would help me a lot. Middle school isn't just a stop between elementary and high school—it's a world of its own. I would be following your blog. Thank you Ma'am.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Our projects are very similar. The software is different, and my kids are not in the special education program. I have made a note to continue to follow your blog.

    http://educationalinquirer2013.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I will follow yours as well. It will be interesting to compare the results we get.

      Delete