After hours of work, I have revised my action research plan, which is posted below. I would greatly appreciate any feedback and will return the favor. Thank you!
Corina Kelly’s
Action Research Plan
|
||||
Goal: Determine
the impact of the SuccessMaker math intervention on third, fourth, and fifth
grade special education students’ improvement in math performance.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1. Meet with some members
of the leadership team and SuccessMaker representative to discuss the purpose
of the SuccessMaker program.
|
C. Kelly
Site supervisor
Campus Instructional
Specialist
Campus Technologist
SuccessMaker
representative
|
March 2013
|
SuccessMaker training
materials
|
Meeting notes
|
2. Attend training led by
SuccessMaker representative in order to learn about program’s rationale and
how to effectively implement the program.
|
C. Kelly
SuccessMaker representative
|
March 2013
|
SuccessMaker training
materials
Computer connected to the
internet
|
Training notes
|
3. Meet with 1st-5th
grade classroom teachers to discuss special education math concerns and the
use of SuccessMaker math as an intervention.
|
C. Kelly
Site supervisor
Campus Technologist
1st-5th
grade classroom teachers
SuccessMaker
representative
|
March 2013
|
SuccessMaker PowerPoint
Computer and projector
Handouts for teachers
|
Meeting notes
|
4. Create a schedule to
ensure all special education students have at least four 15-minute sessions
of SuccessMaker math weekly that do not conflict with other interventions or
requirements.
|
C. Kelly
Site supervisor
|
March 2013
|
Campus master schedule
Classroom teachers’
schedules
Speech and Dyslexia
teachers’ schedules
|
Approval of completed
schedule by site supervisor
|
5. Meet with Campus
technologist to arrange for 10 laptop computers to be updated and set up with
appropriate software for implementation of SuccessMaker.
|
C. Kelly
Campus Technologist
|
March 2013
|
10 Laptop computers
Requirements to run
SuccessMaker program on computers
Link to SuccessMaker
program
|
10 Laptop computers
located in special education classroom run SuccessMaker.
|
6. Implement SuccessMaker
math program based on approved schedule.
|
C. Kelly
Site supervisor
|
March 2013 – January 2014
|
10 Laptop computers
Approved schedule
|
SuccessMaker report
showing students spending at least 45 minutes weekly on math program.
|
7. Meet with SuccessMaker
representative to learn how to gather, interpret, and analyze program’s math
data.
|
C. Kelly
SuccessMaker
representative
|
March 2013
|
SuccessMaker training
materials
Computer connected to the
internet
|
Meeting notes
|
8. Read relevant
literature to gather information about the success of SuccessMaker math or
similar web-based math interventions.
|
C. Kelly
|
March 2013 – May 2013
|
SuccessMaker math
literature
|
Reflection about
literature that evaluates the success of SuccessMaker math or similar
web-based math interventions.
|
9. Collect, interpret, and
analyze control group assessment data from the Scholastic Math Inventory.
|
C. Kelly
Campus Instructional
Specialist
Site supervisor
|
March 2013 – May 2013
|
Scholastic Math Inventory
(SMI) scores for 3rd-5th grade special education
students from the beginning of the year (BOY) and middle of the year (MOY)
for the 2012-2013 school year
|
Evaluation of 3rd-5th
grade special education students’ growth in math performance from the BOY to
the MOY for the 2012-2013 school year based on SMI scores.
|
10. Collect, interpret,
and analyze summative data from the Scholastic Math Inventory.
|
C. Kelly
Campus Instructional
Specialist
Site supervisor
|
January 2014 – February
2014
|
Scholastic Math Inventory
(SMI) scores for 3rd-5th grade special education
students from the beginning of the year (BOY) and middle of the year (MOY)
for the 2013-2014 school year
|
Evaluation of 3rd-5th
grade special education students’ growth in math performance from the BOY to
the MOY for the 2012-2013 school year based on SMI scores.
|
11. Compare data collected
in steps 9 and 10 to determine the impact of SuccessMaker math on improvement
in math performance.
|
C. Kelly
|
February 2014 – April 2014
|
Evaluations of data
collected in step 9 (growth without intervention) and step 10 (growth with
intervention).
|
Evaluation of data showing
students’ growth in math performance without SuccessMaker intervention
compared to growth with the intervention.
|
12. Evaluate the action
plan by presenting results of action research to campus, site supervisor, and
online colleagues.
|
C. Kelly
|
May 2014
|
Literature review
Data obtained in all
previous steps
|
Action Research Report
Blog Postings
Oral presentation at
faculty meeting
|
Format based on Tool 7.1 from Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools
(Harris, Edmonson, and Combs, 2010)
Your plan looks well thought out and thorough. Your timeline looks good, and honestly, it helped me with mine. I look forward to hearing about your results and journey on here. I also am curious as to how much our plans will change as we begin our inquiries.
ReplyDeleteThanks! I'm glad I was able to help a little. I know I looked to others' plans for help when writing mine.
ReplyDeleteThis plan looks great! Your plan really helped me in the structural development of my own plan. You're timeline is well thought-out and spaced out enough so you won't be bogged down with work. I am very interested in seeing the results of your plan regarding special education students. I think recording the progress and success of our special education students is often overlooked and this information is of vital importance to special education teachers and programs. Its great that you are zeroing in on one specific program and its success. Great job!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Steve! I hope my results will bring more attention to the needs of special education students. I tried to keep my project from getting too large by examining many different interventions. After reading the Harris et al. text, though, I realize that I need to add more sources of evidence for the growth in math performance.
DeleteCorina, this looks great!!! I love that you have so many steps for data collection and analysis. In situations like you are dealing with, it is incredibly important to generate as much valid information as possible. I know that when looking at student performance, many districts simply try the next big fad in education, but do not spend the time necessary to see if that program actually works for the students. I have never heard of SuccessMaker before, so I am looking forward to seeing the results of your study. I have many math teacher friends who are looking for ways to improve student performance in math, so I know this research will be very helpful to them!
ReplyDeleteI am a substitute teacher in my district and most of the time they call me in Middle school and whether I liked it or not it turned out that I always teach Math inclusion or special education Math so your research would help me a lot. Middle school isn't just a stop between elementary and high school—it's a world of its own. I would be following your blog. Thank you Ma'am.
ReplyDeleteOur projects are very similar. The software is different, and my kids are not in the special education program. I have made a note to continue to follow your blog.
ReplyDeletehttp://educationalinquirer2013.blogspot.com/
Thanks! I will follow yours as well. It will be interesting to compare the results we get.
Delete